My second semester as a collaborative pianist at Montclair State University is finally coming to a close, and, as it does, I wanted to take some time and reflect about what the qualities that I think a good accompanist should possess.
First off, I am simply amazed at the quality of the collaborative artists here. They are top-notch, and they carry a ton of responsibility. Between 15 collaborative pianists, we manage to cover lessons, classes, practicums (the equivalent of an ASU “area recital”), juries, and recitals for about 350 students. Needless to say, we’re busy people.
However, I will be vocal and say that the school has a few unfortunate setbacks. Due to the layout of the university and the rapid amount of growth within the music school, none of the pianists have their own office. We will frequently work on Boston upright pianos that are grossly out of tune, broken, and unresponsive. The faculty members sometimes will teach from these instruments. The pianists are constantly running around to try and accommodate for as many students as possible. Often, music can be provided in an untimely fashion (or not at all), rendering pianists helpless if they don’t know the repertoire for the type of student they’re accompanying. Only so much research and background knowledge can assist with these problems before a pianist cannot do more without music in the correct key and correct style.
It can be very frustrating to have to try and perform in a professional manner under the circumstances; thankfully for collaborative pianists, I can say with certainty that all of us are used to it by now. We all have repertoire that we know backwards and forwards in many different keys (for example, I’ve had to play many double bass pieces in as many as three different keys for different performers). As much as I don’t want our seeming “incompetency” of sight-reading cut-off/lightly-copied/tablature songs to seem like a weakness, it can come across that way when students aren’t well-prepared to present clean copies of music in a timely fashion.
Sometimes, these situations can make it difficult to gratify oneself as being an “artist”. Personally, I find it challenging to play musically when I’m trying to decode what looks, to me, like another language.
There are times, though, when I’m proud to say that I have a sensitivity for music that can hold everything together in a performance like glue. As pianists, I think a lot of us are used to being able to cover (or “save”) performers, sometimes without them even realizing their mistakes. We have to adapt to the tendencies of individual performers; from my personal experience, solo artists don’t usually think they have to adapt to the pianist. We have to see how they attack/release pitches, know if they tend to go sharp or flat, understand where they’re most likely to make mistakes (and figure out how to cover/cue for them in those instances), and anticipate their artistry. All of that is what goes on in a pianist’s brain, BEFORE even looking at music! We strive to stay alongside the performer through every note, while, at the same time, staying fully-prepared for anything to go wrong. It’s like walking on pins and needles.
Maybe others will disagree with me, but I call myself an “accompanist” instead of a “collaborative pianist” for these very reasons. Often, I find myself so much more attuned to the performer I’m trying to keep in check that I can belittle my own contributions to a performance. After all, if a vocalist should skip a line and move on to another phrase, who looks silly to an audience member? The singer, who kept right on going…or the accompanist, who, if he/she can’t find the singer, is lost? In lessons, whose artistry is perfected by a specific teacher? Whose name is bigger on the program? Who takes the final bow?
I think that being an accompanist at any level, for anybody, deserves quite a bit more thanks than it’s been known to receive. Not only do accompanists have to deal with the threat of a performance collapsing, but they’re responsible for knowing other artists inside and out (and for being able to make split decisions). Often, they’re forced to work in less-than-ideal conditions – transposing songs on the fly, making up introductions and conclusions, finding cuts, providing extra cues – just so the solo artist can glow in the spotlight. Most of all, we have to be entirely confident in our own ability to make beautiful music. It has to be automatic, but in the style that’s demanded from individual performers. If you can’t follow somebody well, your reputation is at stake. And in a place like New York City, word about your performance quality can travel FAST.
It’s important to stay sharp and keep skills refined. All of them. For me, this includes classical/jazz hanon, improv, sight-reading (a MUST), transposition, orchestra score reduction, and – perhaps even more important than all of these – keeping cool. There are GOING to be situations where pianists feel merciless and out of control, and there are GOING to be things that all performers do that drive us nuts. But I can’t stress enough how vital of a skill it is to be able to handle these problems with grace and sensitivity; to give a kind (but fair) offer of encouragement as to how the collaborative experience can be more enjoyable for all parties in the future; and to joke about it later in the bar, when you’re not under a watchful eye.
And somehow, we all end up doing the best we can…while preparing to be a musical version of Superman, swooping in to clean up messes before people even realize they occur. Thankfully for me, I’m right where I want to be. I’ve never wanted the spotlight – I think it comes with too many expectations and too much pressure. Besides, I kind of enjoy thinking of myself as a Clark Kent. It gives me pride to know that I can lurk behind the scenes of danger and keep everybody cool and happy. I think that’s what allows musicians to be so expressive in performance. The more I can free somebody to be one with their artistry, communicating music’s message to an audience, the more they can relax and enjoy the beauty of what they’re creating. And that’s what music’s all about, right?
I’m trying to work as hard as I can to make my own performance flaws less noticeable, and to make my ability stretch far beyond the notes on the page. The sooner I can make my expression automatic, my sight-reading laser-sharp, my improv skills impeccably crisp…the sooner I’ll have a real shot at being a coveted musician out here!
With that, it’s back to the practice rooms. Even though MSU’s semester technically ends today, I still have three recitals to play this weekend! The life of an accompanist…
Stephen